On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 20:47:40 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Greegor47@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Sep 18, 8:43 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
http://www.bayofplentytimes.co.nz/localnews/storydisplay.cfm?storyid=...
>>
>> This is crazy.
>>
>> People in rural areas have ANIMALS...some are potential food sources,
>> and some are guard dogs and the likes. They serve a purpose. They
>> are not pampered 'pets'. Pigs are allowed to wallow in crap because
>> that's what pigs do. Dogs have fleas because that's what dogs have.
>> Cats breed out of control on the hills because that's what cats do.
>>
>> The next thing you know they'll be saying that because you don't let
>> the chickens in the house in the winter you're more likely to commit
>> murder.
>
>Betty, We have already discussed this.
Back on Sept. 18th, according to the date stamp.
Why you want to bring it up 10 days later is a mystery.
>It was brought up that most states use a
>"risk *****sment instrument" (form!) to
>decide whether parents were guilty of
>child abuse.
>
>The form is not supposed to be used to make
>that decision, but in fact it IS use for that.
>
>One consortium of states that created such
>a form was called "Structured Decision Making"
>but had a disclaimer that their form
>was not to be used for "decision making"! LOL
>
>Having obtained some of these forms, it was
>brought up that a single mom living in the
>country and butchering livestock would
>automatically qualify as a very high risk
>for abuse before the agency nitwits even
>showed up at her door!
>
>Points against her on the scoring:
>single mom
>rural
>butchering or owning firearms
>
>Those are enough to make her guilty
>before the investigation even starts!
>
>Yet you are just NOW discovering that
>this kind of crap is absurd??
She posted it 10 days before your reply. You are the one just NOW
discovering anything.
>
>Ya see now why I think a lot of caseworkers
>are vegetarian city living kook liberals?
Aside from the vegetarian, you've described yourself.
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott Hanson, inmate 1104135, wife and child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.0401111639.6825febd@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
|
