On Oct 2, 9:01=A0pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 8:51=A0am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to hear why it is that owning firearms, or butchering
> > livestock would put a person in a risk category.
>
> The Michigan Risk *****sment form was partly
> typed into the newsgroups and
> made available as a scan online for a while.
That doesn't answer the question.
> Call up the CPS a-holes and ask them why.
Neither does that.
> You are just NOW figuring out that they do
> some insane things?
Or that.
> Any kind of insane BS can be rationalized
> by morons calling themselves social workers.
Or that.
> > Let me rephrase that, I can understand why owning firearms would be
> > considered a risk factor, as children often get ahold of guns and
> > accidents happen.
>
> There is NO WAY to knock off negative points
> if they own a gun safe or trigger locks.
Still not an answer to the question.
> Typical ultraliberal veggie kook city slicker moron stuff!
What is?
In the United States eight children a day are killed by firearms.
Are you claiming only city kids are shot to death?
And are vegetarians?
Or are they killed by vegetarians?
> > =A0Now, tell me why it is that you presume someone
> > would be considered at risk for butchering.
>
> First look up the Michigan risk *****sment form
> that was brought up in ascps before.
> Then call up the CPS a-holes and ask them.
>
> I'm sure they think it's highly logical.
>
> But don't look for the web site for
> Structured Decision Making (SDM) because
> they yanked that shortly after I began
> to ridicule the absurd disclaimer.
:- )))))))))))))
> With a name like that they had to
> put on a disclaimer that their BS
> paper form was not to be used for
> DECISION MAKING! =A0 LOL
>
> They got a bit worried
> about some legal liability!
How would the form make them legally liable?
> And they claimed that CW's who use it
> needed to take their expensive TRAINING
> on how to use it. =A0
How expensive?
List the costs for each state.
> But very few if any
> agency personnel attend the expensive TRAINING.
How do you know that?
|
