On Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:16:17 -0700 (PDT), "Dragon's Girl"
<bettywirsen@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Oct 19, 5:07 pm, Greegor <Greego...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> G > And you are wrong.
>> G > They are UNION MEMBERS.
>> G > What part of that don't you understand?
>>
>> BW > Prove it.
>>
>> G > Prove they are UNIONIZED??? LOL
>>
>> BW > Yes. Prove it.
>>
>> [... ]
>>
>> G > Remember your recent comments that I don't need a trial.
>>
>> BW > Want to bring that up again?
>> BW > You admitted to abusing Lisa's daughter.
>>
>> G > Correction, I admitted to stuff that YOU decided
>> G > was abuse. Stuff the LAW does not define as abuse.
>>
>> BW > I would think that every state in this
>> BW > country would call cruel and unusual
>> BW > punishment 'abuse'. Forcing cold showers
>> BW > on a child is cruel and unusual punishment,
>>
>> OMG, ABE LINCOLN and hell, most of early America
>> not to mention most Native American and
>> European cultures ABUSED THEIR KIDS when they
>> took snow baths after the sweat lodge,
>> or the water was cold? Is that right, Betty?
>
>You're not Abe Lincoln, and you don't live in Europe.
>
>
>>
>> Perhaps after the June 2008 flood here
>> in Cedar Rapids Iowa, when even the
>> RED CROSS provided only COLD showers
>> from an industrial tanker, that
>> was massive child and adult abuse, too? LOL
>
>You're comparing necessity to forced punishments?
>Figures.
>
Greg's mental defect allows him to rationalize anything he does.
>
>>
>> BW > and you admit that you did so for punishment sake.
>>
>> I believe I used the terms aversive consequences.
>
>One definition for 'aversive':
>
>a reprimand, punishment, or agent, used in aversive conditioning
>
>OMG, are 'aversive' and 'punishment' synonymous with one another?
>
In this context, YES!
>
>> This was to counter the opposite effect.
>> Prior to this the child was basically seeing the
>> nice shower as a REWARD for peeing herself, and
>> trending toward doing it more frequently.
>
>Devious little seven year old.
>
More probably pathologically lying Greg.
>>
>> And I know that you hate THAT IT WORKED! LOL
>
>Whaaat? You think I care?
>That's HILARIOUS.
Someone expresses a hate for the abuse he inflicted on the
defenseless girl, and Greg's damage mind sees it as hating that his
abuse got the results he wanted.
>
>>
>> BW > I've seen the posts myself.
>> BW > Do you have to have a trial for me to know that?
>>
>> G > Betty, If you wish to blur the distinction
>> G > between your PERSONAL, BIASED and MOTIVATED
>> G > OPINION, and a legal fact, perhaps so.
>>
>> BW > There is no reason for my PERSONAL opinion
>> BW > to be BIASED, nor is there MOTIVATION.
>>
>> LOL
>> Oh yeah! You're playing the GOOD COP!
>> You're posing as my bestest old buddy old pal!
>> LOL <snicker>
>
>LOL Greg, you're pitiful.
>
He's not that good.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> BW > I said 'one of the best examples'.
>> BW > Who's pretending that it's the
>> BW > only rule they've broken?
>> BW > I said 'ONE OF THE BEST EXAMPLES'. ONE.
>>
>> G > Why so LIMITED?? Considering there are
>> G > so many and so grievous?
>>
>> BW > How many paragraphs of text do you think
>> BW > I have time to type in one day?
>> BW > Just because I don't type what you
>> BW > WANT me to doesn't change anything.
>>
>> Yeah, What do I think you ARE, somebody
>> like Kent Wills, Dan Sullivan or something?
>> LOL
|
