The following is a retraction statement that Mark Thorson has posted to
various
newsgroups:
Subject: Retraction of Anatoxin-a Primer
During the last several years, I have from time to time posted to this
and
other newsgroups a file of information called "An Anatoxin-a Primer." I
now
retract the statements made in the Anatoxin-a Primer.
The Anatoxin-a Primer implied that Super Blue Green Algae from Klamath
Lake,
produced by Cell Tech, contains anatoxin-a (a neurotoxin I
characterized as
addictive), and that Cell Tech deliberately avoids testing for this
toxin
because anatoxin-a is responsible for the effects re****ted by SBGA
users. I
have since been advised that Cell Tech conducts regular tests that
would
disclose anatoxin-a, and that this toxin has never been found in Super
Blue
Green Algae. I had no basis for the suggestions I made in the
Anatoxin-a
Primer, and I hereby retract it in full.
Mis-state
to state incorrectly : give a false account of
False
intentionally untrue
lie
untrue with intent to deceive
===========
Having no basis is L Y I N G!
As for Mark Probert, he ia a DISBARRED ATTORNEY.
Your further lies are also noted.
LIAR.
YOU REPEATEDLY LIED OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER.
>I merely posted the URL
>to a database that had your PUBLIC information in it, the
>same information anyone could have found in a phone book.
Wrong.
>The URL to a database is:
>http://www.switchboard.com
>At the top of that page is says:
>Telephone Directory.
In that posting, you posted a link that says at the top Switchboard
*People
Results*
>I did not, otherwise a Google search on my name and this
>newsgroup for "Bryant" would turn up such a posting.
Can it Mark. Anyone can clearly see this Byrant things is just another
dirty
trick of yours.
You are a liar and you know it.
> At the time
>I posted it, three J. Drew's showed up in Bloomington,
Well now.
That was a people's results page and NOT the URLto a database that had
your
PUBLIC information.
You went to the datebase, then you posted the results AFTER you did the
searching.
Now to prove the total liar, you are. You see Mark liars are sooner or
later
exposed. Today is your day, and most likely you won't learn, that your
bringing
it up over and over, is a problem with you.
My asterisks added.
From: Mark Thorson (nos...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Subject: Re: Admitting when one is wrong
View this article only
Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative
Date: 2002-05-26 21:30:10 PST
Karuna wrote:
> Is this what happened?
> Mark (Thorson): In July 2001, someone suggested to you, here on mha,
> that
> another poster was most likely female and also might be apprehensive
> about
> being harrassed by others on the 'net. You responded by posting a
linked
> access to several names and phone numbers, one of which might be that
> person, thereby *inviting* such harrassment.
> Is that true?
**"Inviting" is your characterization, but I did post
the link to switchboard.com, which was a simple
search that yielded several names, any or none
of which could have been Jan, which came from
a public database.***
**And if Jan had said it that way, I would not have disputed the accuracy
of
what she said, except in the area of intent.
*** It was more of an impulse***
decision, triggered by the previous posting in the thread
***It was as though a finger-shaped holes suddenly appeared in front of
me.**
****I couldn't resist sticking my finger in it.****
At the time, it didn'tseem like a big deal, because it was just like
calling up information on the phone. But I see now that it doesn't look
any
different than encouraging harassment, so I agree that I shouldn't have
done
it.
On this one point, Jan, I apologize. I do not wish any third party to
harass
you.
===
Mark Thorson
Sep 12 2004, 8:35 pm
You said I posted your address. Not true.
You said I posted search results. Not true.
For me to be a liar, there must have been a LIE.
YEARS LATER, YOU ARE STILL LYING!
|
