"Mark Probert" <mark.probert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:3e58883c-beab-49f2-aff7-b462de4b0f35@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apr 11, 6:04 pm, Kulacz <drkul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 11, 5:46 pm, Mark Probert <mark.prob...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 11, 5:21 pm, Kulacz <drkul...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > WOW. This makes we wonder about proper synapse firing.
> > > Mark Probert emailed his brother-in-law, a retired NYPD captain now
at
> > > Homeland security about an email that could not remotely be
considered
> > > a personal threat or a National threat.
> > > Is this normal behavior or a threat?
>
> > > Unbelievable.
> > > Talk about people that cannot deal with opposing opinions!!!!!!!
>
> > Do not email me again. You use my openness as a means of attacking
> > me.
>
> Yo fail to tell the complete story Mr. probert.
Projection. YOU failed to tell the whole story. In another post, in
this same thread, I stated:
"Second, YOU emailed me with the name of a family member, a retired
NYPD Captain who now works for Homeland Security. I had not emailed
you for weeks. YOU initiated it. Since my relative is in a highly
sensitive position, I felt he should have a heads up.
His comment was, "thanks for the info." "
> Repoerting me to HOMELAND SECURITY!!!!!
> This place is wacko.
No, I forwarded your email to my brother-in-law, who is employed in a
sensitive postion within Homeland Security. I told you that, but you
want to distort it.
> I certainly will not email you again even though you sent me several
> unsolicited emails weeks ago.
Which did not attack you in the slightest, nor did it raise any issues
with regard to your family or affiliations. The subject matter was
this group.
> Openeness? Hardly. I would embrace openness.
Let's see, you know about my family, and I know nothing of yours.
Please post the details.
> I did not reveal the benign content of these current emails oinly the
> fact that you re****ted me to HOMELAND SECURIYT!!!!
> as that is an im****tant open point.
Like I said, YOU mentioned my brother-in-law, who holds a sensitive
position. I forwarded the email to him. Period. You do have a problem
with comprehension.
> A bit agressive on your part, don't you think?
Not as much as snooping around to find dirt regarding my background.
==
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/700befbe50981fe7
June 20, 2006
BreastImplantAwareness.org wrote:
> Disbarrred Probert's fellow Posse member, Andrew M Langer, also
> harassed the directors of our foundation previous to me sending a
> polite email to his wife.
It is the fact you sent the email which is not polite.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/50d5f5befeaf81dd
> Care to address the point that *you* stated?
> *It is the fact you sent the email which is not polite.*
> I noted you didn't. Why is that, Mark?
You were sent the email because YOU ARE HER ENABLER.
You are part of the problem, and foreign to the solution.
|
