Re: Mom is charged for making medical decisions, this is NOT a free country

"Marc Bissonnette" <dragnet\_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:Xns9AD447B211951dragnetinternalysisc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> fell face-first on the keyboard.

Oh, really?  You are a peeping Tom all the way from Canada?

> This was the result: news:8hhck.4428$np7.4101@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:j8Ubk.13159$xZ.1717@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> http://news.aol.com/health/story/ar/_a/mom-accused-of-denying-son-chem
>>> o/20080703102809990001?icid=200100397x1205086835x1200242430

Note the bit of dishonesty from an owner of a IPS.

http://news.aol.com/health/story/ar/_a/mom-accused-of-denying-son-chemo/20080703102809990001?icid=200100397x1205086835x1200242430

>> Labrie declined comment to the Salem Evening News as she left court.
>> Her lawyer, Kevin James, said Labrie had taken her son more than 100
>> times to Massachusetts General Hospital and "has been extensively
>> involved in this child's care."
>
> A hundred times ? Big deal.

Were you there?  Are you a mother?
Indeed it is a very big deal.  But, then-how would you know?
Got any kids or, sick kids, Marc?

 Being "extremely involved" doesn't mean
> skipping appointments designed to keep him alive.

*extensively*
>
> One may skip a general checkup because you've got other priorities -
She,
> however, not only skipped a ton of the chemo appointments,

*a ton* ?

 but didn't fill
> in his prescriptions, either. She *chose* to let him die.

*In your opinion*.

She did not choose any such thing.

Neither are prosecutors and police authories on medical matters.
Then, there is the cancer doc, who is of *organized medicine*.

Where was the Dad?  Oh, yeah a bitter divorice?

>
>
>
> -- 
> Marc Bissonnette
> Looking for a new ISP?

No, and spam is not allowed.