Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Parenting > Kids Health > Re: Mark S Prob...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 19 of 31 Topic 7405 of 7876
Post > Topic >>

Re: Mark S Probert posts about intellectually honest --Amanda vs. Jenny

by "Jan Drew" <jdrew1374@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jul 12, 2008 at 11:36 PM

"Mark S Probert" <mark.probert@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>intellectually honest

In the Matter of Mark Probert (Admitted as Mark S. Probert), a
Suspended Attorney, Respondent.
Grievance Committee for the Tenth Judicial District, Petitioner.

92-02731

SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT

183 A.D.2d 282; 590 N.Y.S.2d 747

November 9, 1992, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY:   [***1]

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Grievance Committee for the
Tenth Judicial District. Respondent was admitted to the Bar on
February 15, 1978, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme
Court in the Second Judicial Department, under the name Mark S.
Probert.

DISPOSITION: Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline
upon the respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is
granted; and it is further,

HEADNOTES: Attorney and Client - Disciplinary Proceedings

Respondent attorney, who is charged with 22 counts of failing to
cooperate with investigations of alleged misconduct by the Grievance
Committee, and who has failed to answer or appear, is disbarred.

COUNSEL:

Frank A. Finnerty, Jr., Westbury (Muriel L. Gennosa of counsel), for
petitioner.

JUDGES: Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Bracken, Sullivan and Harwood, JJ.,
concur.

Ordered that the petitioner's motion to impose discipline upon the
respondent based upon his failure to appear or answer is granted; and
it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately,
the respondent, Mark Probert, is disbarred and his name is stricken
from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent shall continue to comply with this Court's
rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended and resigned
attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,

Ordered that pursuant to Judiciary [***2]  Law § 90, the respondent,
Mark Probert, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain (1) from
practicing law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or
employee of another, (2) from appearing as an attorney or
counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission
or other public authority, (3) from giving to another an opinion as to
the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4)
from holding himself out in any way as an attorney and
counselor-at-law.

OPINIONBY: Per Curiam.

OPINION:  [*282]

 [**747]  By decision and order of this Court dated September 29,
1989, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law until the
further order of this Court based upon his failure to cooperate with
the Grievance Committee. By further order of this Court dated June 4,
1992, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and
prosecute a disciplinary proceeding  [*283]  against the respondent
and the Honorable Moses M. Weinstein was appointed as Special Referee.

 [**748]  A notice of petition and petition was personally served upon
the respondent on July 2, 1992. No answer was forthcoming. The
petitioner now moves to hold the [***3]  respondent in default. The
motion was personally served upon the respondent on August 14, 1992.
The respondent has failed to submit any papers in response to the
default motion.

The charges involve 22 counts of the respondent's failure to cooperate
with the Grievance Committee in its investigations into complaints of
professional misconduct.

The charges, if established, would require the imposition of a
disciplinary sanction against the respondent. Since the respondent has
chosen not to appear or answer in these proceedings, the charges must
be deemed established. The petitioner's motion to hold the respondent
in default and impose discipline is, therefore, granted. Accordingly,
the respondent is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of
attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective immediately

Source:

 NY UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, ATTORNEY REGIST. UNIT

Currency Status:

 ARCHIVE RECORD

NAME & PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION

Name:

 MARK PROBERT

Date Of Birth:

 11/XX/1946

Gender:

 MALE

Address:

 1698 WEBSTER AVE

 MERRICK, NY 11566

County:

 NASSAU

Phone:

 516-968-5572

EMPLOYER INFORMATION

Employer:

 MARK S PROBERT ESQ

Organization:

 PERSON

LICENSING INFORMATION

Licensing Agency:

 NY STATE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION

License/Certification Type:

 ATTORNEY

License Number:

 1253889

Issue Date:

 00/00/1978

License Status:

 DISBARRED

License State:

 NY

From:   Mark Probert - view profile
Date:   Sun, Feb 11 2001 4:17 pm
Email:   Mark Probert <markpr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Groups:   k12.chat.teacher

Noah has had one since 11/26/96 (my birthday).
===============
> That is Mark S Probert, Merrick,
>
>
> FACT he lied.
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sup****t.breast-implant/msg/822d457...
>
>
> Jan 6, 2004
>
>
> You know something, Sistah Ilena, I'm not Mark Probert
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/9b161d56a4...
>
>
> Jun 7. 2008
>
>
> path:
>
archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.lev­­el3.com!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!ngpeer.n­e­ws.aol.com!audrey-m2.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
> Lines: 107
> X-Admin: n...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: aloysio...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (AloysiousX)
> Newsgroups: alt.sup****t.breast-implant
> Date: 06 Jan 2004 17:54:38 GMT
> References: <19faaec.0401060908.68a7...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
> Subject: Re: A New Year's Resolution
> Message-ID: 20040106125438.01826.00002...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>> Subj: Is There Some Reason...> Date: 2/12/2004 2:18:07 PM Pacific
>> Standard
>> Time> From: AloysiousX> To: JDrew63929>>> Is there some reason why you
>> won't let me ask you a few questions, Jan? > I'm> really curious about
>> your involvement with Ilena Rosenthal.>>> But I guess my most basic
>> question is whether or not you are in California> (like I am), or over
in
>> Indiana, like your profile says.>>> I had thought you were out west,
but
>> I
>> guess not.>>> As Salaam Aleikum!

>>> Aloysious>
>> Mark Probert markprobert1...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  AloysiousX
 




 31 Posts in Topic:
Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-10 13:02:33 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
"news.chi.sbcglobal.  2008-07-10 21:00:04 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-11 03:34:04 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
"D. C. Sessions"  2008-07-11 07:05:19 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-11 04:12:49 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
"trigonometry1972@[E  2008-07-11 00:41:38 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-11 21:54:03 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-11 12:30:30 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-11 12:33:32 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-11 22:06:09 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-11 12:34:02 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-11 21:57:48 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-11 12:39:04 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-11 23:41:41 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-12 19:13:20 
Re: Mark S Probert is a name caller and despicable--Amanda vs. J
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-12 23:23:05 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-13 04:37:24 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-12 19:18:29 
Re: Mark S Probert posts about intellectually honest --Amanda v
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-12 23:36:59 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-14 02:32:45 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-12 19:19:22 
Re: Mark S Probert double *proven* liar does NOT read Totah ever
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-12 23:45:26 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mike <Mike@[EMAIL PROT  2008-07-14 02:36:02 
Re: Mark S Probert double *proven* liar does NOT read Totah
Raving <raving.loonie@  2008-07-16 10:45:48 
Re: Mark S Probert double *proven* liar does NOT read Torah ever
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-17 00:28:35 
God makes you stupid, researchers claim ... Re: Mark S Probert d
Raving <raving.loonie@  2008-07-16 23:24:00 
Re: God makes you stupid, researchers claim ... Re: Mark S Probe
"Jan Drew" <  2008-07-17 19:13:44 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
urillan <urillan@[EMAI  2008-07-17 09:08:00 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-17 14:02:36 
Re: Amanda vs. Jenny
Mark Probert <mark.pro  2008-07-17 14:05:35 
Re: God makes you stupid, researchers claim ... Re: Mark S Probe
Raving <raving.loonie@  2008-07-17 22:31:52 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 9:53:10 CST 2008.