NB: this has nothing to do with breast implants or
the environment, so please respect the follow-ups
and leave them in peace.
In message <0PudnajX471KxOHVnZ2dnUVZ8hednZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, JOHN wrote:
> "Peter Parry" <peter@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:1gth741afp88bop2nnif5prfjj67f84vhv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>
>> Professor Simon Baron-Cohen
>> Director, Autism Research Centre, Cambridge University"
>
> http://www.whale.to/vaccine/baroncohen_h.html
Aren't you the one who's always complaining about
/ad hominem/ attacks?
> >discredited Andrew Wakefield
> A lie http://www.whale.to/v/gmc_wakefield.html
Which part is a lie, John?
That he was retained by plaintiffs to testify that
vaccines caused autism, *before* he did his "study?"
That his "representative subjects" were mostly the
the nominal plaintiffs in the UK lawsuit?
That he had patented a supposedly safer measles vaccine
before announcing the horrors of the current one?
That he sent out his intestinal samples to the top lab
for PCR analysis, which informed him that the only
traces of measles in the samples were from a strain
that doesn't exist in the wild but was in use in his
laboratory?
That he then sent the samples to another lab which was
already on retainer from the plaintiffs?
Which of these is a lie, John? Do keep in mind that
all of these are backed up by primary do***ents, not
just your usual statements of opinion.
--
| "Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against |
| unintelligible propositions. Ideas must be distinct |
| before reason can act on them" -- Thomas Jefferson |
+-------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---------+
|
