On Jul 21, 10:00=A0pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Mark Probert wrote:
> > On Jul 20, 8:00 pm, Ilena Rose <B...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> News from Ilena Rosenthal: Health Loverhttp://ilenarose.blogspot.com
>
>
=A0>>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-kirby/amanda-peet-vsmedical-sci_=
b...
>
>
>
> >> Amanda Peet vs. the Medical Establishment
>
> > Factual medical do***ention left intact. Idle conjecture, ad homiem,
> > and political rants removed.
>
> > oops, nothing left.
>
> Incorrect. There were no ad hominem attacks in the text. And no
> political rants either unless quoting or mentioning a politician
> qualifies as a political rant.
What the politicians were saying are politcal rants. Period. They are
not scientific evidence.
And, make no mistake, Kirby is pure anti-vac. If you do not see this,
sharpen your "read between the lines skills."
|
