Re: Hidden Mercury in Vaccines?

On Jul 16, 7:46=A0pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Greegor wrote:
> >>>> Read the PDF at the link! =A0It explains how vaccine manufacturers
c=
ould
> >>>> avoid having the mercury in the vaccines detected.
> >>>> They say it's "a practical way of using Hg, with all its undisputed
> >>>> advantages, but still avoiding the 'bad image' of Hg. Having
> >>>> considered all consequences, we can fully sup****t usage of this
> >>>> exciting new technology."
>
>>>>http://blogophiliac.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/how-stupid-do-they-think=
....
> >>> This is a forgery.
> >>> The article was probably copied
fromhttp://www.impfkritik.de/quecksil=
ber/thiomersal.pdf. It is referred
fromhttp://www.impfkritik.de/quecksilber=
/index.php. The page is in German.
> >>> The date of the article is June 28, 2005.
> >>> The comments on the page say "Achtung: Dieses Dokument ist eine
> >>> F=E4lschung!" which means "attention: this do***ent is a fake".
There=
 is
> >>> also a reference
tohttp://www.impf-re****t.de/jahrgang/2005/12.htm#03.
> >>> That page, also in German, says basically the same thing: it is a
fak=
e.
> >> Of course they would say it's a fake. Haven't you heard of
> >> disinformaiton?

G > What company was this supposed to be internal TO?

G > If the do***ent is fake, Is the science fake as well?

Mike > According to

http://www.impf-re****t.de/jahrgang/2005/12.htm#03

Mike > such a mercury isotope as described is
Mike > technically possible but at an astronomical expense.

Without amortizing that across millions of vaccinations?

If it's very expensive but lasts for YEARS of
production, it could conceivably still be
cost effective.

Isn't it bizarre that somebody would go to all
of the trouble to use apparently valid science
in an allegedly fake do***ent?

But fail to fake the company that it supposedly
was internal to?