Re: Hidden Mercury in Vaccines?

Greegor wrote:
> On Jul 16, 7:46 pm, Mike <M...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Greegor wrote:
>>>>>> Read the PDF at the link!  It explains how vaccine manufacturers
could
>>>>>> avoid having the mercury in the vaccines detected.
>>>>>> They say it's "a practical way of using Hg, with all its undisputed
>>>>>> advantages, but still avoiding the 'bad image' of Hg. Having
>>>>>> considered all consequences, we can fully sup****t usage of this
>>>>>> exciting new technology."
>>>>>>
http://blogophiliac.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/how-stupid-do-they-think...
>>>>> This is a forgery.
>>>>> The article was probably copied
fromhttp://www.impfkritik.de/quecksilber/thiomersal.pdf.
It is referred
fromhttp://www.impfkritik.de/quecksilber/index.php.
The page is in German.
>>>>> The date of the article is June 28, 2005.
>>>>> The comments on the page say "Achtung: Dieses Dokument ist eine
>>>>> Fälschung!" which means "attention: this do***ent is a fake". There
is
>>>>> also a reference
tohttp://www.impf-re****t.de/jahrgang/2005/12.htm#03.
>>>>> That page, also in German, says basically the same thing: it is a
fake.
>>>> Of course they would say it's a fake. Haven't you heard of
>>>> disinformaiton?
> 
> G > What company was this supposed to be internal TO?
> 
> G > If the do***ent is fake, Is the science fake as well?
> 
> Mike > According to
> 
> http://www.impf-re****t.de/jahrgang/2005/12.htm#03
> 
> Mike > such a mercury isotope as described is
> Mike > technically possible but at an astronomical expense.
> 
> Without amortizing that across millions of vaccinations?
> 
> If it's very expensive but lasts for YEARS of
> production, it could conceivably still be
> cost effective.

The cost is pro****tional to the amount. Cannot be cost effective.
Making single dose vials and charging more for them makes more sense.

> 
> Isn't it bizarre that somebody would go to all
> of the trouble to use apparently valid science
> in an allegedly fake do***ent?
> 

One does not have to be a scientist. Having a friend with a degree in
physics is enough. The friend will answer questions not necessarily
knowing what it is all about.

> But fail to fake the company that it supposedly
> was internal to?

How does one fake a specific company? (Strictly speaking, an entity.
NIH for example is not a company.) That requires help from an insider
who is privy to real internal do***ents, knows how they look like etc.