Re: the requirement that the state *provide* an education

Banty wrote:
> In article <QvGdnRTSDMkYSBXVnZ2dnUVZ_sbinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, Stephanie
> says...
>>
>> Pologirl wrote:
>>> The hard facts of life are that, if a child is sent to school
>>> without breakfast or provision for lunch, then sending the child
>>> home is unlikely to get them fed.
>>>
>>> A better option would be to provide a school breakfast as well as a
>>> school lunch.
>>>
>>> Pologirl
>>
>> Point... WOOOOOOSSHHHHHH
>>
>>
>
> Dewoo****fy please, because I also missed the point, and didnt know it
> until now.
>
> Batny


The trend toward entitlement not being good for those who wind up entitled

and where it ends. (One could easily argue that how bad that is must be 
measured against the bad of being in a stinky family situation.) Also the 
spending of resources on taking care of these issues not being good for 
everyone's education.