Re: the requirement that the state *provide* an education

In article
<9950ca85-8dd0-4742-b5ce-55689977760f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
cnbottcher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>
>
>One morning he came to school, walked into the classroom and slowly
>laid down on the carpet during sharing circle. One of the special
>educators in the classroom noticed a particularly unusual manner about
>the child and asked him to sit up. The child could not focus, his eyes
>were fogged over, and his clothing and breath smelled of marijuana. It
>seemed as though to the adults in the room. This child had come to
>school, high, but completely against his own will.
>
>The aid in the room immediately re****ted this to the head teacher in
>the room. However, once the teacher new what was going on se went to
>re****t it to the office that something could be done about this
>childrens home situation. However, because nothing could be proven by
>his demeanor, nor the smelly clothing, or "bad breath" nothing was
>ever done about the situation. This was surely not the only time that
>child came to school in that state of mind.

What.

Something has to be proven by the school (which is not an enforcing agency
let
alone an investigative agency) to re****t this strongly suspected problem
to CPS
or similar agency for *their* investigation?

Banty